Dear Mother Nature…

I am just having some fun with this post - For serious information on climate change and why these silly lefties are wrong and/or thieves, go to http://wattsupwiththat.com.

 

In response to Breitbart.com’s Report on a video released by Conservation International back in October.

Dear Mother Nature,

I saw your video, and I am deeply offended.

I, for so many years, have held the belief that we would be arrogant to believe that we could affect the earth in the large, negative way that treehuggers (and crony capitalist politicians) claim we do.

You don’t exactly need us, from a secular standpoint. You have in fact been here much longer than us, though the exact period time is disputed.

I don’t dispute any of these claims. I think that based on all scientific evidence we have been able to collect, you are correct in all of these things.

The notion I take offense to, is that us “parasites” are helpless to your will.

“when I thrive, you thrive. When I falter, you falter… or worse” – Mother Earth AKA Julia Roberts

You have said that you have fed far greater species then mine. You have also said that you have starved far greater species than mine…

Really? A greater species? Name one.

We may be nothing more than fleas on the back of the metaphorical dog that is earth… But so what?

Last time I checked we damn near conquered your ass. And while we may not be hindering your performance as a whole, no dose of “flea-be-gone” you throw at us is going to end us.

“Starved far greater species than you.”  Ha! Give me a break! You’ve been hanging out with Brian Williams too much.

Are we supposed to believe that the dinosaurs were trying to predict your next move Mother Nature?

We are a species that not only can tell what you are “thinking,” but with out failure tactically succeed in out smarting you every time.

We are a species that has, as a whole bested the worst you can throw at us. So much so that we got bored, built a f*cking space shuttle, launched ourselves into the unknown, all in the hopes of finding new problems we can tackle just to occupy our minds while we sit around comfortable on this boring battle ground you call earth.

Last time I checked the score was Mother Nature: 0 vs Man Kind: 1

Don’t you get too cocky either Mother Nature, it seems despite your omnipotent attitude you have forgotten one thing. Our relationship is symbiotic.

We aren’t powerful enough to destroy you, but don’t you dare suggest that we are helpless and just along for the ride. We may be fleas on your back, but we are fleas with f*cking space shuttles… ‘Merica

Sincerely,

RJ Payne

 

I want to reiterate that I am just having fun with this. For serious information on why environmentalism is as silly as silly can get be sure to visit http://wattsupwiththat.com and stick around because I might post a serious response to this video on a day when I feel slightly less aggravated. 

Foolish Feminist Of The Week

True consent? – Foolish Feminist of the Week

I recently participated in a twitter discussion on the topic of rape.

A friend of mine posted a picture of herself in a T-shirt that read “No means no.”

On the back the shirt read “Only yes means yes.”

This shirt of course is worn in protest of rape. Now the shirt is somewhat logically consistent. If someone tells you “No, I don’t want to get it on,” and you proceed, you are in fact raping that someone.

However, I have a serious problem with some of the notions tied to these catchy tees.

So I thought I would provoke a little response.

I asked if the shirt was in protest of rape (which is quite clear cut and easy to identify), or was it in protest of a person convincing another person to have sex with them.

I was told by one @peniggas, a feminist in the local area, that convincing someone to sleep with you is in fact rape.

I then questioned @peniggas a bit more on subject, and proceeded to call her argument one of cowardice and selfishness.

Let me explain.

Convincing someone to have sex with you may not be right. And there are certainly illegal ways of doing it, but it is not rape. At it’s worst, it could be considered sexual harassment.

The key word here is “convincing.”

If someone does not give you consent, and then later does in fact give you consent after you have spoken with them about it. You have changed their mind, consent has been given, now making the act consensual.

There are literally tons of parallels to this, especially considering that the concept of “consent” is not limited to sex.

When you take out a loan, and put your signature on the line with the bank, you have given the bank consent. They will sign their side and they will have given you consent.

You have now agreed to the terms of the loan. You may not like it, but you have.

Now obviously in a loan you are locked in because the money is spent and yada yada yada.

I am not saying that you shouldn’t stop if a consensual sex partner asks you to. I am simply saying, the act has begun because both parties agreed.

The reason @peniggas argument is cowardly and selfish lies in the practicality of it. By her logic, anyone who has sex can say (AFTER THE FACT) that despite giving consent, that they did not want too, and therefore they were raped.

Again, there are definitely illegal ways of “convincing” people to do anything. Blackmail, threatening someone physically, threatening someone close to a person physically. Basically if you have to commit another illegal act to convince this person to sleep with you, it’s probably rape. (Though I do still have a problem calling with such a situation based on ferocity contrast between what traditional rape tends to be, and what a like one described above might be.)

Needless to say don’t be this guy ⬇️

The offer

The argument that @peniggas used is stereotypically nothing more than a way for girls to shrug off the consequences of their actions in the sexual realm.

I do not believe @peniggas is one of these girls after more discussing matters with her further, but her argument was still silly.

@peniggas’ argument relied on one logically fallacious concept. The concept of “True Consent”.

She told me that just because Person A gives  Person B consent, doesn’t necessarily mean that Person A wants to, and therefore it is not true consent.

I have no problem with this concept as a concept. However, in the realm of practicality, this little diddy is all jacked up!

Let’s say you are walking out of a grocery store, and there is table surrounded with girl scouts trying to sell you cookies. You really don’t want to, but everyone is watching and you don’t want to look like a snide prick by walking past them. So you buy the cookies, despite the fact that you really didn’t want to spend the money on some shitty shortbread cookies… Did those girl scouts just rob you? Better yet… DID THEY RAPE YOU??? 🎶DUN DUN DUN🎶

How about someone asking you to give to charity and even though you really don’t want to, you do it anyways so as not to upset that person, or bear the consequences of __Fill In The Blank__

Did that charity worker rob you?

The answer is no, you gave consent. You gave money. You gave them permission to take it despite the fact that you didn’t want to.

The laws must be written in such a way that they can not only be effective, but just. (I know this is a new concept to all you idealistic, feminist, silly geese out there, but bear with me.)

There is no way of ever measuring what people truly want in there heads. We cannot enforce laws based on thoughts. It is wrong to do so. Laws address the tangible.

The truth of the matter is, sexual consent should be tied to ones desire. If one does not act in accordance with what they desire, how can they ever expect to achieve what they desire.

If I want Mexican food, but instead go to an Italian food restaurant, would it be logical of me to expect to eat Mexican food?

No, because I didn’t act on my desire.

If a boy asks you to have sex with him, and you say yes despite the fact that you really meant no.

He did not rape you, you are just a moron.

Caveat was already given above, and so I am putting a period here.

P.S.

@peniggas blocked me on twitter though I am not quite sure why. She was one of the more intellectually honest feminists I have spoken to in literally a decade.

Manson didn't want to kill! That makes it okay right?

Manson didn’t want to kill! And what he wanted is what really matters, not what he did right?

Come on kids, It's a party!

Stupid millennials don’t know a thing about life! Let alone politics!

I called into the Medved show the other day during a segment in which Michael was discussing young people and there involvement with politics.

He had many other callers prior to me, talking about how “Millennials just don’t care about politics.” and that those that do “are just stupid and naive”

All of this is true…

But I did not hear a single person question why that was!

This prompted me to call in.

You see I don’t know if any of these other callers had children of their own. But I will give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that none of them had/have children.

Still their comments were very silly. The all commented so emotionally, stressing how they felt about the issue. Anger, despair, confusion, all of these emotions could be heard in the voices of Michael’s callers during the segment.

These emotions however, are in response to actions committed by the wrong group of people.

The youth are young. They are kids, without any life experience. That is the very reason why we distinguish them with words like youth and young!

So how can you blame them for acting based on the knowledge that they have? It’s all that they have!

Who they really should be blaming are those who raised this generation of dummies!

AKA THEMSELVES!!!

Any person who has children of their own, better not utter a single complaint about the ignorance of the youth unless said person’s child is on par with their standards.

We can’t blame the education system for two reasons.

#1 The education system ANSWERS TO YOU!!!

If the education system in your community is failing to teach kids to critically think by indoctrinating children into a narrow minded state, or by avoiding said topics all together THAT IS THE FAULT OF THE PARENTS IN THE COMMUNITY!

#2 Raising a child is the job of THE PARENT AND NO ONE ELSE!!!

THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM HAS NO BUSINESS DISCUSSING VALUES OR BELIEFS WITH YOUR CHILD! That is the job of the parent.

Now it’s one thing for discussion on certain topics to be present in the classroom such as economics or science, so long as accurate history is taught to our students. But once again all these things fall back on the taxpayer AKA the parents.

What do your kids know about the world around them? Are you really surprised by the way that our youth think? Take a look at their role models for christ’s sake!

If you are surprised because you think your kids know what’s what, I recommend you talk to them about controversial topics. Odds are if you have never thought about the state of our youth in this manner, your child’s answer to your questions will surprise you.

btw Mikey agreed with me 😎

No Holds Barred

No this isn’t an opinion piece on Eric Garner.

Though with a title like that… I can’t say I wasn’t tempted 😈

 

I wanna talk about the rules of engagement.

The code of conduct.

 

Every single one of us played tag in grammar school.

And every single one of us encountered that one person who never seemed to be “it” no matter how many times they were tagged.

This person though tagged often, would claim things like “no tag backs” and “at least three finger tips.”

Finally someone would get fed up, and would set out to tag this person in an irrefutable manner.

The cheater at this point would be aware that his/her peers were catching on and would have already devised a scheme to maintain dominance in the game.

The fed up child  would strategically, and respectfully full hand tag the cheater…

And at this, the cheater would throw him/herself to the ground and begin to sob because their ankle hurts…

Sound familiar?

It should, and not because we all played tag in grammar school.

But because that is how the American left acts. Like whining, crying, CHEATING, snot-nosed babies. We see it everyday on the t.v. the newspaper, the Youtube, and the Twitter.

Screaming, crying, CHEATING leftists.

 

This is a problem. A major problem.

A problem because the right wing is handicapped in a the realest way.

 

We put up our dukes, the ref blows his whistle, and while we concentrate on our training, our strategy, our right hook. Our opponent (the left) has something else on it’s mind.

No matter how much time we put into our training, our self discipline, our debate skills, our self reflection/spiritual dedication to the truth, it makes no difference.

Because the minute that whistle blows the American left kicks us in the nuts.

And while we roll around on the mat bitching and complaining about the rules the ref (the constituency) who is clearly blind, is counting down our knock out.

As the right wing suffers of nut-shot motivated nausea, the american left stands with it’s gloves in the air claiming victory.

 

Okay, enough with the analogies… What’s your point dude?

What I am trying to say is the world isn’t fair. That is of course because the world isn’t perfect. No matter how good a fighter you are, if you hold yourself to a set of rules and your opponent does not, you lose.

In fact this idea/truth is actually present in the real life martial arts scene. This fact of life is so much a reality that every single martial arts coach I have had over the years dedicated time to teaching street techniques. The techniques that are practical when not fighting in a competition where there are rules.

 

It’s time the American right dedicates some time to its street technique, because we are getting our asses handed to us.

 

It’s time to read an Alinsky book or two.

And it’s time to start assaulting, and stop getting assaulted.

We must throw the first punch.

 

I know many traditional conservatives have a problem with this mentality of mine. And that is because they worship the rules. But the rules are only worth worshipping if they are followed.

Ben Shapiro, a prominent figure in conservative media said recently that “The truth is on our side…”

He is correct. And what an advantage that is.

We know that the only economic system that reduces poverty is capitalism. We know that world peace is not possible unless America polices the world. We know that in order for fairness and equality to prevail in our nation, we must advocate states rights and eliminate this big government monster that is terrorizing our home.

We also know that calling it what it is, telling the truth, is not working.

People don’t want the truth. They do not pursue intellectual honesty, or knowledge gain. They pursue comfortability.

And who the hell are we to deny them that?

That being said, we cannot continue to refer to capitalism as capitalism. We must change the name. We must come up with an “economic reform.”

Just like the left did.

We need to rebrand ourselves, because our product is rotting on the shelves.

 

It’s not lying, its branding.

Instead of saying “Look at our product, it works, if you have any sense you will buy it.”

It’s time we say “Look at our product, it’s the best product in the world! Only bigoted, racist, misogynistic, eugenicists will deny it’s greatness!”

The product never changed, it is still in fact the only sensible option. It is just the way we present it that must change.

 

It is time to coin terms and plant germs.

It is time to fight dirty, because we are doing the time already.

 

I for one am tired of rinsing sand from my eyes…

I’d like to throw a handful or two of my own.

Picture from pushbacknow.net

Muslims love all people! Especially christians! They just love them to pieces!

Over the years I have put more than a few hours into the research of Islam.

My interest began when I was in the sixth grade attending a private catholic school in my hometown.

Despite it being a private catholic school, many of my teachers sympathized with radical Islam (yes, it is redundant).

This was very irritating to me. The classroom became a war zone during our chapters of study on the crusades (and that was just the start of our studies on Islam, it lasted like an 1/8th of the school year, possibly longer.)

Today I try to comment on it as little as possible (on social media) because I am aware of the danger. It is by no means a peaceful religion. And the “peaceful muslim majority” is a downright lie.

But don’t take my word for it…

Let’s look at some stats

Scary right?

Are you starting to understand why this is such a big deal.

“History repeats itself”

I usually hate cliches like this, but Islam is a perfect example of why this one proves true.

after all, its been 238 years, and they still haven’t stopped f*cking with us.

MarinesHymn

How long will we wait to end this threat?

The more important question?

How long do we have…

marjijuana

To the American Right Wingers who hate the Ganja

There are many things to consider when discussing the legalization of marijuana. Things such as use behind the wheel and our new semi-socialized healthcare system.

But none of these things matter.

Pot does not matter.

There are far too many other important things to be discussing at the moment, such as the crisis in the middle east, the healthcare gov. monopoly, or even illegal immigration.

And yet all too often I find that the conservative mainstream media makes it a topic of discussion.

I find myself screaming at that pompous ass Bill O’reilly at least once a week because he does a segment on pot.

I understand that he is one of the most watched cable news figures, I also understand that the majority of his audience are those of 50 years or more.

However, just because young people aren’t tuning in to your show, doesn’t mean they don’t hear what you are saying. (Media Matters has Twit Game)

And the minute you crusade against pot, you effectively tear the right wing of America in half. Because while many, definitely not most but many, would agree with you Bill some don’t. And those who don’t we can’t afford to have turned against us.

I am not saying those who are fiscal conservatives and like to rip bongs are going to start subscribing to commie bull because you said you don’t like weed.

No, not at all…

What I am saying is there are stoner, libertarian, fiscally conservatives folks who have never given politics a thought at all until now, and we need their vote.

Pot has been around for a really long time, and legal or illegal, it’s here to stay. So please for the love of God, pull your head out of your old saggy ass and avoid the topic. Please.

In a perfect world, a Reagan America, we could afford to have these discussions, but not today.